The follow up to Friday's post on the capture of Fort Harrison, and the role in its defense by the Pamunkey Artillery . . . another letter to the Richmond Sentinel.
[Correspondence
to the Sentinel.]
CHAFFIN'S
BLUFF, Oct 11, 1864
Mr. Editor- Inasmuch as there seems to be great misunderstanding in regard to the
part taken by the battalion of artillery stationed at this place, in the fight
with the enemy on the 29th of September, when the advance was made on our line
of defences, immediately below this place, and as there seems to be a strong
disposition on the part of some, who are entirely ignorant of the whole affair,
to attach all the blame of the fall of Fort Harrison to our battalion, of the
sake of justice, I desire to make a plain
statement of facts, that the public may know who are to blame and who
are not.
About 5 o'clock on the morning of the 29th September, the battalion, hardly
two hundred strong, (more than one hundred of it being on duty at Signal Hill,
about -- miles below, was marched to the breastworks.- Thirty five men of the Goochland
Artillery, under Lieut. Guerrant, were ordered to Fort Harrison; the remainder, ten, were at Fort
Gilmer, manning the two guns there. These even lighted the fuses in their
shells and rolled them down on the enemy in the ditch, when they were too close
for their pieces. - The James City artillery, commanded by Lieut. Davis, were
sent North of Fort Harrison, on the Varina road, to man four pieces of
artillery there, two of which could not be used on account of the ammunition
being too large. The others were worked until nearly all the ammunition was
expended, and the enemy between them and our lines. The men then made their way
back as best they could and, as infantry, helped to repulse a charge of the
enemy on a redoubt next to Fort Harrison, and afterwards the attack on Fort
Gilmer.
The Lunenburg artillery, Captain Allen; Howitzer company, Lieut. Winder;
and Pamunkey artillery, Capt. Jones- the three numbering less than one hundred
and twenty five men- were ordered to defend the line of works from Fort
Harrison to the river- about a mile and a half- with no infantry support. Capt.
Allen had a detachment of fourteen men with him in a redoubt next to and
commanded by Fort Harrison. The remainder of his company were in different
detachments, considerably lower down the line. As soon as the enemy came in
view of the fort, the guns were opened on them, and continued to fire until
after the infantry support had left, and Lt. Col. Maury, Maj. Taylor, Adjutant
Ellerson, and six of the Goochland artillery were captured at the guns.- While
the infantry, which were there to support the
artillery, (a portion of them Reserves, which a certain newspaper editor
of Richmond delights so much to extol for their gallantry, left the fort, many
of them before the enemy had got within good musket range. Soon after the guns
in the fort had opened Capt. Allen did so from his redoubt. Our guns lower down
the line were in such a position that the enemy could not be seen from them
until they were rushing late the fort, and then our men were kept from firing
by a captain of some other command, who said that the enemy were our own men
falling back. Capt. Allen continued to fire after they had captured the fort, until he was flanked; he
then fell back to the third redoubt from the fort, with Lieut. Winder, who had
hauled two howitzers by hand some three hundred yards, under fire of the enemy,
and put them in position in the third redoubt; and there Capt. Allen and Lieut.
Winder, with less than one hundred men, with two small howitzers, one
twenty-four pound siege piece and a lot of smoothbore muskets; and Capt. Jones
a little farther back, in another redoubt, with but a handful of men and two
pieces of artillery, check the triumphant advance of the enemy for nearly an
hour, when that portion of the battalion on duty at Signal Hill, and a portion
of Johnson's Tennessee brigade, came to our assistance; but had we not held the
position, all of these would have been cut off and probably captured.
And now Mr. Editor, since there are some very wise and officious persons,
who are so desirous of giving this battalion all the blame for the fall of Fort
Harrison, when there was only 35 men of it there, and some of those were taken
at the guns, when, too, the enemy admit that our artillery fire was very
destructive, I desire that those will tell who checked the advance of the enemy
and kept them from coming to and capturing the Bluff while our gunboats were
below, and having command of our lower pontoon bridge, as their papers falsely
state they do.
And I would further state that late in the evening, when reinforcements
came, General Pickett's men were charged the enemy cut off the two redoubts
next to Fort Harrison, that a portion of our battalion joined them and were
among the foremost in the charge, as some of General Pickett's men can testify.
But some may say, that after remaining silent so long, we might have
remained so in reply, we have to say, that several communications have been
sent to a certain paper in Richmond, called, by some, the soldier's friend, and
neither have been heard from; not even from an official list of casualties- and
we feel that we have a right to demand that justice which, though tardy, is
sweet to those who having done their duty feel they deserve it.
JUSTITIA
-The Sentinel(Richmond), October 13, 1864